News :: National

Christie Vetoes N.J. Marriage Equality Bill

by Angela Delli Santi
Friday Feb 17, 2012
  • PRINT
  • COMMENTS (9)
  • LARGE
  • MEDIUM
  • SMALL
  (Source:Associated Press)

TRENTON, N.J. -- Gov. Chris Christie has followed through on his promise to reject a bill allowing same-sex marriage in New Jersey by quickly vetoing the measure Friday.

The veto came a day after the state Assembly passed the bill. The state Senate had passed it on Monday. Christie, a Republican who opposes same-sex marriage, had vowed "very swift action" once the bill reached his desk.

In returning the bill to the Legislature, Christie reaffirmed his view that voters should decide whether to change the definition of marriage in New Jersey. His veto also proposed creating an ombudsman to oversee compliance with the state’s civil union law, which same-sex couples have said is flawed.

"I am adhering to what I’ve said since this bill was first introduced - an issue of this magnitude and importance, which requires a constitutional amendment, should be left to the people of New Jersey to decide," Christie said in a statement. "I continue to encourage the Legislature to trust the people of New Jersey and seek their input by allowing our citizens to vote on a question that represents a profoundly significant societal change. This is the only path to amend our State Constitution and the best way to resolve the issue of same-sex marriage in our state."

Democrats who had pushed the bill forward said they were disappointed, but not surprised, by Christie’s action.

"It’s unfortunate that the governor would let his own personal ideology infringe on the rights of thousands of New Jerseyans," said Reed Gusciora, one of two openly gay New Jersey lawmakers and a sponsor of the bill. "For all those who oppose marriage equality, their lives would have been completely unchanged by this bill, but for same-sex couples, their lives would have been radically transformed. Unfortunately, the governor couldn’t see past his own personal ambitions to honor this truth."

Senate President Steve Sweeney was more blunt in his criticism of the governor.

"He had a chance to do the right thing, and failed miserably," Sweeney said.

Proponents of the bill said gay marriage is a civil right being denied to gay couples, while opponents said the definition of marriage as a heterosexual institution should not be expanded. The legislation contains a religious opt-out clause, meaning no church clergy would be required to perform gay marriages and places of worship would not have to allow same-sex weddings at their facilities.

Steven Goldstein, chairman of the state’s largest gay rights group, Garden State Equality, said Christie’s national political ambitions guided his action.

"He won’t veto the bill because he’s anti-gay," Goldstein said in a statement issued before the veto was issued Friday. "He’ll veto the bill because the 2016 South Carolina presidential primary electorate is anti-gay."

Goldstein, who said he has a cordial relationship with the governor, promised to continue fighting him vigorously on the issue. "And we will win, so help me God," he said.

Another gay marriage supporter, Washington state Democratic Gov. Chris Gregoire, also reached out to Christie, a practicing Catholic. Gregoire sent the governor a letter last month offering to talk about gay marriage because, in her words, "while I am a Governor, I am also a Catholic."

The Roman Catholic Church opposes same-sex marriage.

Gregoire signed a gay marriage measure into law in Washington on Monday. Her spokeswoman, Karina Shagren, said Christie hasn’t responded to the letter.

Thirty states, including South Carolina, have adopted constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriages, most by defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

Six states and Washington, D.C., allow gay marriage. Washington state’s new gay marriage law is set to go into effect in June.

Lawmakers in New Jersey have until the end of the legislative session in January 2014 to override the veto.

They would need two-thirds of the lawmakers in the Assembly and Senate to agree. Both votes to pass it fell short of that mark. Christie has virtually guaranteed that no override would succeed because Republicans wouldn’t cross him.

The Democratic-controlled Legislature has failed in every previous attempt to override Christie, most notably on a cut to women’s health care and an effort to reinstate a tax surcharge on millionaires.

Christie - and most Republican lawmakers - want to put the issue to a public vote. One GOP lawmaker, Sen. Kip Bateman of Somerset, has proposed a ballot question asking voters to allow same-sex nuptials. However, the most powerful Democrat in the Legislature, Senate President Steve Sweeney, has said that won’t happen.

Democrats are hoping that support for gay marriage - 52 percent for gay marriage, 42 against it, in New Jersey, according to one recent voter poll - will continue growing.

If same-sex couples can’t win gay marriage through legislation, they have engaged in a parallel fight in the courts. Seven gay couples and several of their children have sued, claiming that the state’s civil union law doesn’t work as intended.

Civil unions were designed to provide the benefits of marriage to gay couples without the title. They were adopted after the Supreme Court instructed the Legislature to provide marriage equality to same-sex couples.

The state’s own review commission has since found problems with the law, and same-sex couples have backed that up with testimony before the Legislature.

John Grant and Daniel Weiss, an Asbury Park couple who are in a civil union, are among those who testified in support of gay marriage.

When Grant was in a life-threatening automobile accident and rushed to a New York hospital in 2010 - before that state legalized gay marriage - Weiss said he couldn’t authorize badly needed surgery or even go through his partner’s wallet to find his health insurance card. He said their civil union was essentially worthless; Grant’s neurosurgeon even asked, "What is a civil union?"

A gay marriage bill was defeated in the Senate two years ago, just before Gov. Jon Corzine, a Democrat who supported the measure, left office. Advocates’ hopes dimmed with the arrival of Christie, who spoke against gay marriage when asked about it during his campaign.

---

Associated Press correspondent Rachel La Corte in Olympia, Wash., contributed to this report.

Copyright Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Comments

  • mandy, 2012-02-17 18:57:38

    Now i think the people of New Jersey made a huge mistake in putting a no brain, no heart republican as governor of their state, well you guys can still impeach him if you want, always remember, until this (republican party) learns the meaning of the word "EQUAL", they should not be allowed to run a state or the whole country.


  • Anonymous, 2012-02-17 20:22:05

    He has a heart. An enlarged fat-ladden, artery clogging, plaque building, wheezing, sweating in 68 degrees, straining, counting down for a massive MI hopefully while choking down a pork roast, congestive heart. Someone should propse a bill that bans fat people from marrying... Fat people are unhealthy, they are a strain on the medical system. Fat people offend the sensibilities of thin people. Fat people breed little fat people that grow up with diabetes. Fat people are a strain on the transportation system. Fat people are bad for the economy especially in the buffet industry. Fat people use more jet fuel. Auto accidents with fat people are worse because they carry so much inertia. Fat people are bad for the garment business because they use up more textiles. Fat people are bad for the environment. Fat people should be denied their civil right to marry and eat whatever they want. Fat people should not be allowed to breed. Face it, the anti-fat bill has just as much merit as denying same sex marriage. Which is no merit at all. Hopefully the next elections will put more dems in place.


  • Anonymous, 2012-02-17 21:36:11

    He stood by his word and did what he said he was going to do. He made it very clear as well. We as Americans are entitled to our opinion. Not to mention our beliefs. As a gay man from NJ. I never supported Gov. Chris Christie. ( Still will NOT support him.) Yet, there are other issues at hand. He has done well in office compared to others. ( Corzine, Whitman, Codey, McGreevey.) We can not change his values or his opinions. Of course, as always Nj will do what it does best. Copy other states like New York and California. We will just have to wait it out until someone else comes along. Or there is a BIG influence to change. The whole point is to show other states. Not to mention the country that times will be changing. Wether it be NOW or in 2016. At least we are not in 1950! I say this, once gay marriage is passed. What is next? I hope it’s the whole concept of marriage. It should be valued. Not treated like a Drivers license. But that is another issue. Will just have to wait and see when divorce rates start accumulating.


  • jimbodapimp, 2012-02-18 00:21:00

    This fat fuck is going to get impeached!


  • Anonymous, 2012-02-18 11:16:59

    NJ should start either impeachment or recall on the grounds when he took his oath ... He forgot the is a seperation of church and state.... And on another grounds he put his wish to run for the President in 2016 above the rights of the people of NJ.... Shame on you Gov.Christie.....shame on you.....


  • Zenji, 2012-02-18 17:59:22

    In the words of George Takei, "there are just some things that people shouldn’t vote on. If they did, there would be no equality amongst the genders, women would not have the right to vote, and blacks would still be slaves." This governor is a coward! Grow some cajones!


  • Anonymous, 2012-02-19 18:10:46

    I vote for the massive heart attack. Hopefully while he’s blathering about his bullshit religious convictions.


  • JohnREHDennis, 2012-02-20 09:58:02

    Look at the fat faggot standing at the podium.


  • Wayne M., 2012-02-20 16:40:36

    Christie feels the rights of LGBT people to make a personal choice to marry the person they love should be subject to approval by the majority of people. Like so many social conservatives, he cannot seem to get past the myth and lie that sexual orientation is a choice. However, even if sexual orientation were to be a matter a choice (and scientific information proves otherwise), that is no reason to deny protection of equality rights. We rightfully protect the equality and civil rights of religious groups, for example, and one’s religious preference is definitely a choice - or will Christie and his allies call for a referendum in Saudi Arabia or Iran on whether to protect religious rights?


Add New Comment

Comments on Facebook